dotclaude

Skill in documentation

readme-writing

Write or restructure a README that gets a reader from landing to first success in minutes: a one-line purpose, a working quick start verified against the actual code, then usage, configuration, and contribution pointers in the order a new user needs them, with nothing the code contradicts. Reads the repository first and never documents behaviour it has not confirmed. Use when a project has no README, when the README has drifted from the code, or before publishing a package or repository.

Arguments
(optional) the audience (users, contributors, both) and anything the README must cover

Install

As a plugin

Bundled in the docs plugin. Add the marketplace once, then install the bundle; it updates with the marketplace.

/plugin marketplace add KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude
/plugin install docs@dotclaude

As a single item

Run from the project root; the skill lands under .claude/. Copy it to ~/.claude/ to make it global.

npx shadcn@latest add KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude/readme-writing

Files installed

  • .claude/skills/readme-writing/SKILL.md

What it does

A README is the front door. Its first screen must answer three questions: what is this, is it for me, how do I try it. Everything after that is in order of how soon a new user needs it. The README is verified against the code, not written from memory of the code.

Read before writing

  1. The manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod): name, version, entry points, scripts, dependencies, engines.
  2. The entry point and the public surface: CLI flags (--help output if it runs), exported functions, routes, config schema.
  3. Existing docs, CONTRIBUTING, LICENSE, CI config, examples directory, tests (they show real usage).
  4. Run the quick start you intend to document. If it does not work, the README says what actually works.

Structure

# name

One sentence: what it does and for whom. (Badges on the next line, at most four: CI, version, license, one more.)

Two or three sentences: the problem it solves and the one thing that distinguishes it. Optional: a screenshot or a 10-line example that shows the payoff.

## Quick start

Prerequisites in one line (runtime version, accounts, keys).
The minimal commands, copy-pasteable, that produce a visible result. Nothing optional here.
What the user should see when it worked.

## Usage

The three to five most common tasks, each: one sentence, one code block, one sentence on the result. Link to full reference docs for the rest.

## Configuration

Table: option, env var or flag, default, what it does. Only options a user will actually set.

## How it works (optional)

Three to six sentences or a diagram, for the reader deciding whether to trust or extend it.

## Development

Clone, install, test, lint, in four commands. Link to CONTRIBUTING for the rest.

## License

Omit a section rather than fill it with filler. A library README leads with the API example; a CLI README leads with the command; a service README leads with the deploy or run command.

Rules

  • Verify every command by running it (or by reading the script it invokes when running is not possible) and say the runtime version it was verified with.
  • Match the manifest: the install command uses the real package name and manager; scripts named in the README exist in the manifest.
  • No aspirational features. If it is planned, it goes in a roadmap section or an issue, not in Usage.
  • Sentence case headings, short paragraphs, no em dashes, no "simply", no "just".
  • Keep the top stable: the first screen changes rarely; volatile detail (options, versions) lives lower or in generated sections between markers so a script can update it.
  • Badges are signals, not decoration: a red CI badge on the README is honest; ten badges are noise.
  • Link, do not duplicate: the changelog, the API reference, and the contribution guide each live in one place.
  • Run humanize on the prose before returning.

Restructuring an existing README

  1. Inventory: list every section and what question it answers.
  2. Check each claim against the code; mark stale ones.
  3. Reorder by the new user's timeline; move contributor material below user material.
  4. Cut what the code no longer does; move history to the changelog.
  5. Keep the URL anchors people may have linked (#install, #usage) even when renaming headings, via a short redirect line if needed.

Report what was removed and why, separately from the new text.

This is the skill as installed, rendered from its source on GitHub. Read it as Markdown.

  • adr-writingWrite Architecture Decision Records that a future engineer can act on: a numbered, immutable record with the context that forced the decision, the options...
  • openapi-specWrite, generate, or review an OpenAPI 3.1 specification for an HTTP API so that it is accurate to the implementation, complete for consumers (schemas...
  • technical-writingWrite and edit developer documentation, guides, design notes, and engineering blog posts with a working writer's discipline: audience and purpose first...
  • adrWrite an Architecture Decision Record from the current discussion or a stated decision: numbers it in sequence under docs/adr/, captures context, the...